Re: --, KJxxx, ATx, 98xxx
On Mar 3, 1:06�am, dak...@aol.com wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2:18 pm, "Andrew" <agump...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > NV vs Vul
> > Online IMPs
> > S: --
> > H: KJxxx
> > D: ATx
> > C: 98xxx
> > Auction
> > LHO *CHO *RHO *You
> > 3S * P * *4S * *?
> > Andrew
> I'm willing to trade typical -500 vs. -620 to avoid the 980 vs. 50
> when/if partner has Sxxx HAQ *Dxxx CAKxxx or simolar.
I don't see haw you make +980 with that hand for partner.
Why this naive assumption that 4S makes? It may of course, but you are
quite likely to score two defensive tricks in the red suits, and the
trump break may come as a nasty surprise to declarer. Change partner's
Q 10 x
x x x
A x x x x